I was wrong. I had thought the Supreme Court deciding the issue would be enough for the Register to give up on defending perverts. Guess not :

"It is becoming increasingly apparent that the residency restriction for convicted sex offenders has spun out of control. Not to Iowa legislative leaders, however. They apparently believe an ineffective law that makes them look tough on crime is preferable to one that actually protects children."

DesMoinesRegister.com

Of course, the Register has yet to explain how moving perverts miles away from prospective victims WON'T protect the victim. Further, the Register hasn't explained how their editorial position fulfills their role as watchdogs of government. They are on a crusade to protect those who would do harm, and I can't figure out how that is speaking truth to power.

...